DocketNumber: Appeal, 135
Citation Numbers: 20 A.2d 206, 342 Pa. 160, 1941 Pa. LEXIS 497
Judges: Schaffer, Maxey, Drew, Linn, Stern, Patterson, Parker
Filed Date: 4/24/1941
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/13/2024
This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial. In its opinion, the court states: "After a careful review of the entire case, we reached the firm conclusion that justice demanded that plaintiff's motion for a new trial be sustained." We have uniformly held that under such circumstances we will not review the action of the court below: Reese v. PittsburghRys. Co.,
The order of the court below is affirmed.
Reese v. Pittsburgh Railways Co. , 336 Pa. 299 ( 1939 )
Commonwealth v. Dolan , 155 Pa. Super. 453 ( 1944 )
Durdella v. Rothman , 159 Pa. Super. 508 ( 1946 )
Commonwealth v. Powell , 527 Pa. 288 ( 1991 )
German, Adr. v. Riddell , 149 Pa. Super. 647 ( 1942 )
Schornig v. Speer , 343 Pa. 649 ( 1942 )
Murphy v. McGinnis , 343 Pa. 255 ( 1941 )
Auslander v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co. , 350 Pa. 473 ( 1944 )
Gerber v. Jones (Et Al.) , 151 Pa. Super. 489 ( 1942 )
Rosanoff v. Duquesne University , 365 Pa. 121 ( 1950 )
Ross v. Crisanti , 171 Pa. Super. 117 ( 1952 )