Citation Numbers: 133 A. 376, 286 Pa. 465
Judges: PER CURIAM, May 26, 1926:
Filed Date: 5/3/1926
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/13/2023
The court below directed a verdict for defendant, judgment was entered thereon, and plaintiffs have appealed.
Anna Harkins, wife of the other plaintiff, Philip S. Harkins, testified that she was a passenger on one of defendant's street cars; she arose to pay her fare, handed the conductor a dollar, and, while waiting for change, the car stopped with a jerk and she was thrown and injured. There is nothing in the evidence to show that any other passenger was affected by the alleged jerk of the car; in fact, no effort was made by plaintiff to describe the attending circumstances, to prove improper manipulation of the car, or so to picture, or describe, the stop and its effect on others in the car as to enable the jury to form an independent judgment concerning its alleged unusual and extraordinary nature. Trolley cars often stop with a jerk under ordinary circumstances. All we have here is a woman standing in a moving car with a suit case in her hand, testimony that the car stopped with a jerk and she fell, afterward discovering that her knee was hurt and her shoe damaged; this is not enough to establish negligent operation of the car: see Uffelman v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co.,
The judgment is affirmed.
Zieger v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co. , 84 Pa. Super. 541 ( 1924 )
Hill v. West Penn Railways Co. , 340 Pa. 297 ( 1940 )
Smith Et Ux. v. Pittsburghi Rys. Co. , 314 Pa. 541 ( 1934 )
Mack v. U.S. Gypsum Co. , 288 Pa. 9 ( 1926 )
Endicott v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co. , 318 Pa. 12 ( 1935 )
Iszard Et Ux. v. P.R.T. Co. , 100 Pa. Super. 240 ( 1930 )
Harrar v. P.R.T. Co. , 92 Pa. Super. 242 ( 1927 )
Schroeffel v. Great A. P. Tea Co. , 132 Pa. Super. 233 ( 1938 )
Tucker Et Vir. v. Pgh. Railways Co. , 153 Pa. Super. 63 ( 1943 )