DocketNumber: 338
Judges: Eagen, Roberts, Nix, Larsen, Manderino, Pomeroy
Filed Date: 1/24/1979
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
concurring.
I join in the Opinion of the Court insofar as it holds that the Act of June 19, 1911, P.L. 1055, § 1, as amended, 19 P.S. § 1051, authorizes the trial court’s order of restitution as a condition of probation. But I do not subscribe to the majority’s view that appellant has waived his contention that the amount of restitution so ordered is arbitrary. Because the issue has been preserved, I would reach the merits and conclude that the contention is without merit.