Cty of Fulton v. Sec of Com, Apl of Dominion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MIDDLE DISTRICT
COUNTY OF FULTON, FULTON COUNTY : No. 4 MAP 2022
BOARD OF ELECTIONS, STUART L. :
ULSH, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS : Appeal from the Order of the
COUNTY COMMISSIONER OF FULTON : Commonwealth Court Denying
COUNTY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS A : Application to Intervene at No. 277
RESIDENT, TAXPAYER AND ELECTOR IN : MD 2021 dated January 10, 2022
FULTON COUNTY, AND RANDY H. :
BUNCH, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS :
COUNTY COMMISSIONER OF FULTON :
COUNTY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS A :
RESIDENT, TAXPAYER AND ELECTOR :
OF FULTON COUNTY :
:
:
v. :
:
:
SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH :
:
:
APPEAL OF: DOMINION VOTING :
SYSTEMS, INC., Possible Intervenor :
:
:
ORDER
PER CURIAM DECIDED: March 21, 2022
AND NOW, this 21st day of March, 2022, the Commonwealth Court’s order of
January 10, 2022, denying intervention is hereby REVERSED and Proposed Intervenor’s
Application for Leave to Intervene for the Limited Purpose of Seeking a Protective Order
is hereby GRANTED. Intervention may be granted to parties whose rights and interests
may be irreparably harmed as a consequence of the progression of the case. See
Bannard v. New York State Natural Gas Corp., 172 A.2d 306 (Pa. 1961) (holding that
intervention is permitted “where the party seeking it has an interest in or will be affected
by the pending litigation”); see also Banfield et al. v. Secretary of the Commonwealth, 442
MD 2006, 922 A.2d 36 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2007) (granting intervention to three voting system
providers for the limited purpose of defending discovery and seeking protective orders).
Justice Mundy and Justice Brobson note their dissent.