DocketNumber: Appeal, No. 50 Misc. Dkt. No. 2
Judges: Blatt, Bowman, Craig, Death, Disalle, Reached, Wilkinson
Filed Date: 2/28/1980
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/13/2024
Opinion by
Walter J. Rippin (appellant) appeals here from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Cambria County which sustained the revocation of his driver’s license by the Department of Transportation (DOT)
The appellant bears the burden of showing that the court below erred, Given v. Given, 25 Pa. Superior Ct. 467 (1904), and, absent proof to the contrary, we presume that public officials acted in a proper way. Moose Lodge No. 145 v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission, 16 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 433, 328 A.2d 180 (1974). Moreover, the appellant cannot fulfill his burden of showing that the court provided inadequate notice merely by alleging so in his brief. If he wished to allege such error, he had merely to petition the court below to enlarge the record so as to contain evidence showing that he had received inadequate notice. This he failed to do, and he cannot now cure this defect in his case. Petro v. Kennedy Township, 49 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 305, 411 A.2d 849 (1980).
The appellant argues further that the order of the court below dated November 17, 1977 indicates the holding of an additional hearing on that date, of which he likewise claims to have received no notice. We believe, however, that a fair reading of that court’s order refutes any such interpretation.
And Now, this 28th day of February, 1980, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Cambria County in the above-captioned matter is affirmed.
xhe order of tbe Court of Common Pleas of Cambria County-stated :
AND NOW, on this 17th day of November 1977, after hearing and full consideration, the action of the Secretary of Revenue [sic] of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in suspending the operator’s license of Walter J. Rippin is sustained and affirmed.