DocketNumber: Appeal, No. 732 C.D. 1979
Judges: MacPhail, Wilkinson, Williams
Filed Date: 6/30/1980
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/13/2024
Opinion by
Petitioner (claimant) appeals from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) denying claimant unemployment compensation benefits under Section 4(1) (4) (10) (B) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law), Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937), 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §753(1) (4) (10) (B). We affirm.
In the 1977-78 school year claimant was a full-time student in a graduate school program at- the University of Pennsylvania (University). Claimant had completed the traditional formal classroom portion of the preparation for her Ph.D. degree and was preparing for the examinations for her doctorate by “reading books” and “taking notes.” Claimant had been assigned an advisor for counseling and for instruction with respect to claimant’s dissertation. The University employed claimant as a teaching fellow, paying her $1,250 for each course she taught. Claimant’s last
Section 4(1) (4) (10) (B) of the Law provides that the definition of “employment” shall not include “[sjervice performed in the employ of a school, college or university if such service is performed (i) by a student who is enrolled and is regularly attending classes at such school, college or university.” The Board concluded that claimant’s program of study to prepare for the examinations for her Ph.D. degree was within the meaning of “regularly attending classes” and that claimant’s services as a teaching fellow were not covered employment. Claimant here argues that Section 4(1) (4) (10) (B) requires that a person attend traditional classes held by her employer to disqualify wages earned from that employer for calculation of financial eligibility.
Accordingly, we will enter the following
Order
And Now, June 30, 1980, the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Decision No. B-166973-B, dated March 12,1979, reaffirming the denial of unemployment compensation benefits to Robin Knee, is affirmed.
It seems appropriate to point out that if claimant desires us to read and apply the disqualifying section literally, then by her own case she is disqualified. Certainly she was enrolled as a student at the University of Pennsylvania. Further, she was regularly attending class at the University, i.e. those classes she taught as a teaching fellow.