DocketNumber: Appeal, No. 1718 C.D. 1979
Citation Numbers: 54 Pa. Commw. 507
Judges: Blatt, Craig, Mencer
Filed Date: 11/13/1980
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 6/24/2022
Opinion by
In this unemployment compensation appeal, claimant
Having worked as a packer for his employer
Claimant contends that the employer failed to meet the burden of proving willful misconduct, and that the alleged actions did not warrant a finding of willful misconduct as a matter of law.
We have held that continued excessive absence or lateness in the face of warnings by the employer constitutes willful misconduct within the meaning of Section 402(e). Fitzgerald v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 49 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 629, 411 A.2d 899 (1980); Woodson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 7 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 526, 300 A.2d 299 (1973). Claimant’s behavior here evidences a willful disregard of the employer’s interests and of his own duties and obligations.
Accordingly, we affirm the denial of compensation.
Okder
And Now, this 13th day of November, 1980, the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, No. B-173843, dated July 11,1979, is affirmed.
Henry Allen.
Unemployment Compensation Board of Review.
Section 402(e) of tbe Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897 as amended, 43P.S. §802(e).
Slim Jim.