DocketNumber: Appeal, No. 21 T.D. 1985
Citation Numbers: 100 Pa. Commw. 294, 514 A.2d 673
Judges: Colins, Kalish, MacPhail
Filed Date: 9/4/1986
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 6/24/2022
Dissenting Opinion by
I respectfully dissent.
While it is true, as the majority points out, that Brandywine did not have notice of the condemnation, and thus did not have the opportunity to select its own counsel, there is no allegation that its interests were not fairly represented. Furthermore, there is no allegation by Brandywine that the amount of the attorney’s fee award is unreasonable. Brandywine’s only complaint is that payment of the fee will diminish the amount it ultimately receives.