DocketNumber: Appeal, No. 2067 C.D. 1985
Citation Numbers: 107 Pa. Commw. 54, 527 A.2d 214
Judges: Blatt, Craig, Doyle
Filed Date: 6/22/1987
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 6/24/2022
Opinion by
Latrobe Road Construction, Inc. (petitioner) petitions for review of the order of the Board of Review (Board) of the Department of Transportation (Department) which affirmed the Departments three year suspension of the petitioner as a bidder on departmental contracts.
Due to the petitioners conviction, the Department,
The petitioner appealed this determination to the Departments Prequalification Committee,
The petitioners due process complaint cites the lack of a hearing prior to departmental prequalification suspensions or revocations. The petitioner also charges a due process violation on its allegation that the individual serving as the Board s chairman was also the individual over whose name the January 9, 1985 letter was sent, thereby impermissibly commingling the Departments prosecutorial and adjudicatory roles.
The Department responds, however, that the petitioner failed to raise these points before the Board and that, therefore, these arguments have been waived.
Pa. R.A.P. 1551 provides that, with respect to the review of quasijudicial orders, no question shall be heard on review which was not raised before the government unit. This bar extends to constitutional claims, which, as here, do not involve the validity of a statute. Long v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 56 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 174, 424 A.2d 587 (1981). And, inasmuch as our review of this record indicates that the petitioner failed to raise the foregoing questions before the Board, we must hold that these issues have been waived.
Next, the petitioner contends that the Department and the Board abused their discretion by imposing a three-year suspension and debarment.
The petitioner offers for our consideration a bifurcated argument, the first element of which is founded on the theory that the administrative action under review does not constitute a present evaluation of the petitioners “responsibility” to perform work for the Commonwealth, but is, in reality, an unlawful punitive
The Department argues to the contrary that Section 404.1 of the State Highway Law
The remaining element of the petitioners abuse of discretion argument is that the suspension or debarment here imposed is beyond the Departments statutory authority to establish prequalification standards because Section 404.1 does not expressly empower the Department to establish punitive systems for violations of law.
It is true, of course, that an explicit grant of such authority is not present within the terms of Section 404.1. We believe, however, that the mandate to establish and maintain a system to qualify “competent and responsible bidders” which is found in Section 404.1 necessarily implies the creation of a disciplinary system to accomplish the legislatures intent.
Accordingly, we will affirm the order of the Board.
Order
And Now, this 22nd day of June, 1987, the order of the Board of Review of the Department of Transportation in the above-captioned matter is affirmed.
As provided in 67 Pa. Code §457.13, the Secretary of Transportation may temporarily suspend or disqualify prequalified bidders for several specified reasons and for “[a]ny other valid reason or cause.”
We find the phrase “or until otherwise notified” to be susceptible to conflicting interpretations. It could be read to mean, we believe, that the Department may either lengthen or shorten the suspension period, but identifies no circumstances, if any, which would cause such revisions.
As defined in 67 Pa. Code §457.1, this committee consists of several specified departmental officers and employees and any person so designated by the Secretary of Transportation.
The Board is defined by 67 Pa. Code §457.1 as follows:
This board shall consist of the Deputy Secretary for Highway Administration, who shall act as chairman, the Chief Counsel, Comptroller of the Department, and Deputy Secretary for Administration, or their designees. The Chief Construction Engineer, shall be the Secretary of the Board as a nonvoting member, and shall keep a complete record of proceedings and decisions before the Board. All tie votes shall be resolved by the Secretary of Transportation.
The Boards order is as follows:
NOW, this 25 [sic] day of June, 1985, it is hereby ordered that [the petitioner] shall be suspended from the Pennsylvania Department of Transportations list of prequalified bidders and shall be ineligible to bid on Department of Transportation contracts for a period of three years from this date.
We note that the Boards order does not include the ambiguous language discussed in footnote 2. We, therefore, will treat the involved suspension as immutable for the purposes of this opinion.
Section 404.1 of the State Highway Law, Act of June 1, 1945, P.L. 1242, added by Section 1 of the Act of September 20, 1961, P.L. 1529, 36 P.S. §670-404.1, pertinently provides that “[t]he department . . . shall, by regulations, establish and may, from time to time, modify or supplement a system for the qualification of competent and responsible bidders on highway projects. . . .” (Emphasis added.)
As 67 Pa. Code §457.2(b)(3) pertinently provides, “[t]he following basic policy shall govern the classification and prequalification of prospective highway contractors . . . [t]o assure the integrity and competence of all bidders.” (Emphasis added.)
See footnotes 6 and 7.