DocketNumber: Appeal, No. 18
Citation Numbers: 39 Pa. Super. 323, 1909 Pa. Super. LEXIS 487
Judges: Beaver, Head, Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Porter, Rice
Filed Date: 4/19/1909
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/13/2024
dissenting:
While it is true that in the construction of wills, the courts favor that construction which, consistently with the words of the instrument, will give a vested rather than a contingent estate, yet this, like all other similar canons of construction, is subservient to the great rule as to the intent. Viewing this will as a whole, I am led to the conclusion reached by the learned judge below as to the intention of the testator, and therefore would affirm the decree.