Citation Numbers: 59 Pa. Super. 414, 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 92
Judges: Henderson
Filed Date: 4/19/1915
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/14/2024
Opinion by
This case was argued with the appeal of Maiy Lawler against the same defendant in which an opinion was this day handed down, ante, p. 409. The appeals involved the same question and the decision here necessarily follows that rendered in the Lawler case.
The judgment is therefore affirmed.