DocketNumber： Appeal, No. 88
Citation Numbers： 61 Pa. Super. 339, 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 329
Judges： Head, Henderson, Iart, Kepi, Orlady, Porter, Rice, Trexler
Filed Date： 10/11/1915
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 11/14/2024
Opinion by
The defendant, while district attorney, unlawfully received the money claimed in this action, and now seeks to retain it through a technicality that is entirely without legal merit. The opinion filed by the court below so fully disposed of the defense interposed, that it is needless to pursue the argument further.
The judgment is affirmed.