Citation Numbers: 68 Pa. Super. 278, 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 110
Judges: Head
Filed Date: 11/19/1917
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/14/2024
Opinion by
- In this case also the learned court below on the oral motion of counsel quashed the indictment under circumstances in every substantial way similar to those in the case of Commonwealth v. Hans, in which we have just
Por the reasons there given, the order of the court quashing the indictment is reversed and set aside, the indictment is reinstated and the record remitted to the court below with a procedendo.