DocketNumber: Appeal, No. 19
Citation Numbers: 213 Pa. Super. 462, 249 A.2d 356, 1968 Pa. Super. LEXIS 792
Judges: Hannum, Hoffman, Jacobs, Montgomery, Spaulding, Watkins, Wright
Filed Date: 12/6/1968
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/13/2024
I respectfully dissent from the action of the majority in affirming the grant of a new trial in this case as a result of a post-conviction petition.
Discovery of the reputation of the minor subsequent to petitioner’s conviction on the charge of statutory rape does not meet the definition of after-discovered evidence as to justify a new trial. The other reasons stated in the petition are equally without merit.