DocketNumber: Appeal, No. 19
Judges: Ervin, Flood, Montgomery, Rhodes, Watkins, Woodsidb, Woodside, Wright
Filed Date: 9/19/1961
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/13/2024
Concurring Opinion by
The scope of judicial review in this case is limited to the determination as to whether there has been a manifest and fraudulent abuse of discretion or a purely arbitrary execution of the Commissioner’s ■ duties or. functions. Eways v. Reading Parking Authority, 385 Pa. 592, 124 A. 2d 92 (1956). There has been no showing of any such abuse or arbitrary action in this case.