DocketNumber: Appeal, No. 48
Citation Numbers: 67 Pa. Super. 110
Judges: Head, Henderson, Kephart, Orlady, Porter, Trexler, Williams
Filed Date: 7/13/1917
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2022
After careful examination of the record in this case, we conclude that the reasons given by the court below fully justify the conclusion reached, and that from every possible point of view, legal and equitable, the defendant ought to pay the mortgage; and that the rule to show cause why judgment should not be entered for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense was properly made absolute.
The judgment is affirmed.
Overholt Et Ux. v. Reliance Ins. Co. , 319 Pa. 340 ( 1935 )
Bowers Co. v. London Assur. Corp. , 90 Pa. Super. 121 ( 1926 )
Clarke Cohen v. Real to Use , 105 Pa. Super. 102 ( 1931 )
Miners Sav. Bk. v. Merch. Fire Ins. Co. , 131 Pa. Super. 21 ( 1938 )
Abbottsford B. L. Assn. v. Ins. Co. , 130 Pa. Super. 422 ( 1937 )
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Crutchfield , 162 Tex. 586 ( 1961 )