PennyMac Corp. v. Garrett, L.

J. S11031/19
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
PENNYMAC CORP. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
PENNSYLVANIA
v.
LUN DES GARRETT, No. 1553 EDA 2018
Appellant
Appeal from the Order, April 23, 2018,
in the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County
Civil Division at No. 8505 -CV -2016
BEFORE: SHOGAN, J., MURRAY, J., AND FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E.
JUDGMENT ORDER BY FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E.: FILED JULY 16, 2019
Lundes Garrett appeals from the April 23, 2018 order entered by the
Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County denying the following:
(1) Defendant June Garrett's Petition to Strike
Summary Judgment and Sheriff's Sale; (2) Defendant
June Garrett's Petition to Intervene, Stay, and Set
Aside Writ of Possession as to Non -Judgment Debtor
Property; (3) Defendants Lundes Garrett and
June Garrett's Petiton to Open and/or Strike Summary
Judgment and Sheriff's sale, and New Matter; and
(4) Defendant Lundes Garrett's Motion for
Reconsideration.
Trial court statement, 7/13/18 at 1 n.1. For the following reasons, we dismiss
appellant's appeal.
The record reflects that following the entering of the trial court's
April 23, 2018 order, appellant filed a timely notice of appeal to this court on
May 21, 2018. On May 25, 2018, the trial court ordered appellant to file a
J. S11031/19
concise statement of errors complained of on appeal pursuant to
Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b). Appellant timely complied on June 12, 2018. The trial
court filed a statement pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a) on July 13, 2018.
In the present appeal, appellant raises 15 issues for our review. (See
appellant's brief at 12-14.) Appellant devotes a majority of his argument to
assail the mortgage foreclosure executed on the property at issue-a matter
that has already been litigated before, and adjudicated by this court. See
.7P Morgan Chase Bank v. Garrett, 105 A.3d 791 (Pa.Super. 2014)
(unpublished memorandum). We will not allocate any additional further
judicial time or resources for appellant to continue to repeat arguments that
have already been addressed by this court. Additionally, we bar appellant
from continuing to raise either the same or related claims without leave of
court. Pa.R.Civ.P. 233.1(c).
We, therefore, dismiss appellant's appeal without prejudice to appellee
to seek relief from the trial court relating to costs incurred in defending this
appeal.
Appeal dismissed.
Judgment Entered.
Joseph D. Seletyn,
Prothonotary
Date: 7/16/19
-2