DocketNumber: Appeal 214
Citation Numbers: 99 Pa. Super. 279, 1930 Pa. Super. LEXIS 320
Judges: Trexler, Keller, Linn, Gawthrop, Cunningham, Baldrige
Filed Date: 4/30/1930
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/14/2024
Argued April 30, 1930.
The Supreme Court in Valicenti's Appeal,
The board of adjustment refused to approve new plans submitted by the appellant which provided for closing the opening between the construction in controversy and a front bedroom and eliminating the front window, without correcting the objectionable second floor feature which they were directed to remove.
The appellants term the affronting projection a porch and contend that the proposed change brings the building within the provisions of the ordinance. The character of the construction cannot be disguised by giving it another name, nor do the proposed alterations, leaving unchanged the external physical lines of the second floor, bring the appellants within the decree of the Supreme Court.
The board of adjustment, and the lower court likewise, held that the second floor projection was contrary to the terms and spirit of the ordinance, and with that view we concur.
Judgment is affirmed.