DocketNumber: Appeal, 149
Judges: Keller, Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadteeld, Parker, James, Rhodes
Filed Date: 5/6/1936
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
Argued May 6, 1936.
The facts in this case, as disclosed by the evidence, are very similar to — in fact, almost identical with — those in the case of Stone v. C.I.T. Corporation, — (this defendant),
The Stone case justifies the submission of the question of punitive damages to the jury. The Ladner and Herdic cases support the position that it is not necessary to separate punitive from compensatory damages in the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.