DocketNumber: 969 EDA 2009
Citation Numbers: 993 A.2d 903
Judges: McEWEN, Mundy, Stevens
Filed Date: 3/17/2010
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 8/25/2023
CONCURRING STATEMENT BY
¶ 1 Since the Opinion of the majority reveals a thorough analysis and presents a perceptive expression of rationale, I hasten to join in the decision of the majority. I ■write separately only to state that, to my mind, it seems rather clear that mother’s failure to respond to the inquiries of the Domestic Relations Office relating to the child’s emancipation should not result in a windfall to father, where, as perceptively concluded by the learned Judge Michael