DocketNumber: 1016 EDA 2007
Citation Numbers: 999 A.2d 608
Judges: Bender, Bowes, Cleland, Freedberg, Gantman, Klein, Musmanno, Shogan, Stevens
Filed Date: 7/14/2010
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 8/29/2023
CONCURRING OPINION BY
¶ 1 I concur. The remand order from the Supreme Court essentially compels the result the majority reaches.
¶ 2 However, the brutal facts of this case notwithstanding, one could argue after this ruling the responsible owner of an aggressive dog risks prosecution and a sentence of six to twelve months in jail for the act of humanely euthanizing an animal which the owner determines presents a risk to humans.
¶ 3 This is a result that clearly calls out for legislative attention to address the interplay among the Crimes Code, The Ani