Citation Numbers: 39 A.2d 161, 156 Pa. Super. 82
Judges: PER CURIAM, September 29, 1944:
Filed Date: 9/27/1944
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/13/2023
Argued September 27, 1944.
There is no substantial difference between the clause in the mortgage given by the defendant corporation, and relied on by it in this appeal, and the corresponding clause in the mortgage passed upon by the Supreme Court in Putnam v. PittsburghRailways Co.,
The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of Judge APONICK. *Page 85