Citation Numbers： 93 A.3d 888
Judges： Bowes, Fitzgerald, Olson
Filed Date： 6/9/2014
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 10/26/2024
files a Concurring Statement.
CONCURRING STATEMENT BY FITZGERALD, J.:
I join the learned majority’s opinion. However, I do not read the opinion as either establishing a bright-line rule or as holding that the mere existence of a no-contact order is dispositive when considering termination of parental rights under 23 Pa.C.S. § 2511(a)(2). In my view, the effect of a no-contact order must be considered in light of the circumstances of each case.
In Re: Q.R.D., Appeal of: N.J.D. ( 2019 )
In the Int. of: D.S.M., Appeal of: G.T. ( 2021 )
In the Int. of: C.L.Z., a Minor ( 2021 )
In the Int. of: D.D.M., Appeal of: D.M., Sr. ( 2021 )
In the Int. of L.M.H., Appeal of: T.F.-H. ( 2019 )
In The Interest of: N.J., A Minor ( 2019 )
In the Int. of: S.S.F., Appeal of: S.F. ( 2020 )
Batterman, C. v. Santo, S. ( 2022 )
In Re: A.M.G., a minor, Appeal of: L.S. ( 2017 )
In the Int. of: T.M.L., Appeal of: T.L. ( 2020 )
In the Int. of: A.E.L.L., Appeal of: T.L. ( 2020 )
In the Interest of: N.M.J. Appeal of: L.J.,Father ( 2019 )
In Re: M.D.O. Appeal of: S.B. ( 2019 )
In the Int. of: P.W.B. Appeal of: W.B. ( 2019 )