In Re: Adoption of C.A.S. minor, Appeal of: B.A.S.

J-S28045-17
2017 Pa. Super. 193
IN RE: ADOPTION OF C.A.S., A : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
MINOR : PENNSYLVANIA
:
:
APPEAL OF: B.A.S, JR., NATURAL :
FATHER : No. 102 WDA 2017
Appeal from the Order Entered December 15, 2016
In the Court of Common Pleas of Cambria County
Orphans’ Court at No(s): No. 2016-890 IVT
BEFORE: OLSON, MOULTON, and STRASSBURGER,* JJ.
OPINION BY STRASSBURGER, J.: FILED JUNE 21, 2017
B.A.S., Jr. (Father), appeals from the order entered December 15,
2016, in the Court of Common Pleas of Cambria County, which terminated
involuntarily his parental rights to his minor son, C.A.S. (Child). We vacate
and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
We summarize the relevant factual and procedural history of this
matter as follows. Child was born in January 2012 to Father and B.N.
(Mother). N.T., 12/12/2016, at 15. Father and Mother lived together for
approximately three years prior to Child’s birth and separated approximately
a year and one half after Child’s birth. Id. According to Mother, she and
Father separated as a result of Father’s drug use, which included bath salts,
heroin, crack cocaine, and pills. Id. at 16-17, 33. Meanwhile, Mother began
dating J.O. (Boyfriend). Id. at 28. Mother and Boyfriend (collectively, the
Petitioners) began dating approximately two and one half years prior to the
____________________________________________
*
Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.
J-S28045-17
termination proceedings, and began living together approximately six
months later. Id. On September 22, 2016, the Petitioners filed a petition to
terminate Father’s parental rights involuntarily, along with a report of
intention to adopt. The Petitioners averred that Father’s parental rights
should be terminated so that Boyfriend can adopt Child.
The orphans’ court conducted a termination hearing on December 12,
2016. Father appeared at the hearing pro se, and requested that the court
continue the matter so that he could obtain an attorney. N.T., 12/12/2016,
at 4. The court asked the Petitioners’ counsel what notice he provided to
Father regarding his right to an attorney, and Petitioners’ counsel explained
that he mailed Father a series of documents, including a “letter indicating
that he’s receiving paperwork relative to his rights as a parent, he has a
right to a free attorney and to contact the Register of Wills if he should
desire one.” Id. at 4-5. Counsel continued, “it expressly says he must file
the enclosed in forma pauperis statement within ten days of the scheduled
date of the hearing and, if he fails to do so, that the court will assume that
he waives his rights to request free legal counsel.” Id. The court reviewed
the documents described by the Petitioners’ counsel, and asked Father
whether he received them. Id. at 5-6. Father acknowledged that he did
receive the documents, and that he contacted Laurel Legal Services in order
to obtain counsel. Id. at 6. Father explained, “Laurel Legal called me and
said that they couldn’t represent me because they don’t take custody cases.”
Id. The following discussion then took place.
-2-
J-S28045-17
THE COURT: It says, Dear [Father], you are receiving
paperwork relative to your rights as a parent. If you feel that
you might qualify for court-appointed counsel at no expense to
you to represent you in these proceedings, you must complete
and file this financial disclosure form, send it or deliver it to Patty
J. Sharbaugh, Clerk of Orphans[’] Court, Register of Wills,
Cambria County Courthouse, with the address.
[Father]: Yes, sir.
THE COURT: Did you do that?
[Father]: I didn’t get that until November 15 is when I
signed for it, so I didn’t get that until November 15. I called
Laurel Legal to see if I could get --.
THE COURT: Okay. Now it didn’t tell you to call Laurel
Legal. It told you to call the Clerk of Courts Office; right?
[Father]: Well, I figured that’s the way --.
THE COURT: Well, that’s not right. . . .
Id. at 6-7.
Ultimately, the orphans’ court denied Father’s request for a
continuance and proceeded with the termination hearing. Id. at 10. On
December 15, 2016, the court entered an order terminating Father’s
parental rights to Child involuntarily. Father timely filed a notice of appeal
and concise statement of errors complained of on appeal.1
Father now raises the following issues for our review.
____________________________________________
1
Father obtained court-appointed counsel on January 9, 2017. Counsel filed
Father’s notice of appeal and continues to represent him before this Court.
-3-
J-S28045-17
1. Whether the [trial c]ourt erred in proceeding with the hearing
to terminate [Father’s] parental rights to [Child] without [Father]
having the benefit of counsel[?]
2. Whether the [t]rial [c]ourt erred in terminating [Father’s]
parental rights to [Child], because the Petitioners failed to meet
their burden by clear and convincing evidence, including, but not
limited to failing to identify how termination of [Father’s]
parental rights would impact the child[?]
Father’s Brief at 3.
We consider Father’s issues mindful of our well-settled standard of
review.
The standard of review in termination of parental rights cases
requires appellate courts to accept the findings of fact and
credibility determinations of the trial court if they are supported
by the record. If the factual findings are supported, appellate
courts review to determine if the trial court made an error of law
or abused its discretion. A decision may be reversed for an
abuse of discretion only upon demonstration of manifest
unreasonableness, partiality, prejudice, bias, or ill-will. The trial
court’s decision, however, should not be reversed merely
because the record would support a different result. We have
previously emphasized our deference to trial courts that often
have first-hand observations of the parties spanning multiple
hearings.
In re T.S.M., 71 A.3d 251, 267 (Pa. 2013) (citations and quotation marks
omitted).
In his first issue, Father argues that the orphans’ court erred by
proceeding with the hearing to terminate his parental rights without
providing him with court-appointed counsel. Father’s brief at 6-8. Father
contends that he has only a seventh grade education, and that he was “not
mentally competent to understand his rights to legal counsel[.]” Id. at 6.
-4-
J-S28045-17
Further, Father contends that he “did not have sufficient knowledge or
comprehension to understand the legal notices to representation which were
provided to him.” Id. at 7-8.
Termination of parental rights is governed by the Adoption Act, 23
Pa.C.S. §§ 2101-2938. The appointment of counsel in involuntary
termination proceedings is governed by Section 2313(a.1) of the Act, which
provides as follows.
(a.1) Parent.--The court shall appoint counsel for a parent
whose rights are subject to termination in an involuntary
termination proceeding if, upon petition of the parent, the court
determines that the parent is unable to pay for counsel or if
payment would result in substantial financial hardship.
23 Pa.C.S. § 2313(a.1).
Parents in involuntary termination proceedings have a constitutionally-
protected right to counsel. In re X.J., 105 A.3d 1, 4 (Pa. Super. 2014)
(citing In re J.T., 983 A.2d 771, 774 (Pa. Super. 2009)). This Court has
held that trial courts need not appoint counsel for indigent parents
automatically. In re A.R., 125 A.3d 420, 424 (Pa. Super. 2015). However,
courts must advise parents of their right to petition for counsel. X.J., 105
A.3d at 4 (citing In re Adoption of R.I., 312 A.2d 601, 603 (Pa. 1973)). A
parent waives his or her right to counsel if he or she is provided with clear
instructions on how to petition for counsel, but fails to take action. A.R.,
125 A.3d at 424 (citing In re Adoption of J.N.F., 887 A.2d 775 (Pa. Super.
2005)).
-5-
J-S28045-17
The certified record on appeal contains copies of the documents mailed
to Father by Petitioners’ counsel. The documents are accompanied by a
certificate of service, indicating that counsel mailed these documents to
Father on November 15, 2016. There are six documents in total, including:
a notice of hearing for involuntary termination of parental rights, a notice
required by Act 101 of 2010, an acknowledgement of notice of voluntary
agreement law, a letter from the Petitioners’ counsel advising Father how to
obtain counsel, an additional notice advising Father of the termination
petition and hearing, and a blank in forma pauperis statement along with a
blank order granting or denying in forma pauperis status.
Each of these documents, with the exception of the in forma pauperis
statement, includes instructions on how to request court-appointed counsel
and/or legal assistance. As observed by the orphans’ court, the letter from
the Petitioners’ counsel and the additional notice of the termination petition
and hearing instructed Father that he should request counsel by filling out
the enclosed in forma pauperis statement and delivering it to the Clerk of
Orphans’ Court and Register of Wills for Cambria County.
However, the notice of hearing for involuntary termination of parental
rights, the notice required by Act 101 of 2010, and the acknowledgement of
notice of voluntary agreement law, all instruct Father that he should obtain
counsel and/or legal assistance by contacting Laurel Legal Services. For
example, the notice of hearing for involuntary termination of parental rights
includes the following instructions.
-6-
J-S28045-17
You have a right to be represented at the hearing by a lawyer.
You should take this paper to your lawyer at once. If you do not
have a lawyer or cannot afford one, go to or telephone the office
set forth below to find out where you can get legal help.
Laurel Legal Services, Inc.
225-227 Franklin Street
Suite 400, Franklin Center
Johnstown, PA 15901-2524
Telephone Number: (814) 536-8917
Notice of Hearing for Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights (attached to
Certificate of Service), 11/18/2016 (unnecessary capitalization omitted).
As explained above, parents have a constitutionally-protected right to
counsel in involuntary termination proceedings. Trial courts must ensure
that parents are advised of their right to counsel and are provided with clear
instructions on how to petition for counsel. See A.R., 125 A.3d at 424. Of
the five sets of instructions that Father received from the Petitioner’s
counsel, three of them instructed Father that he should request counsel
and/or legal assistance from Laurel Legal Services. Because it appears that
Father may have been misled by these conflicting and inaccurate
instructions, we cannot find that he waived his right to counsel.
Accordingly, we conclude that the orphans’ court erred by failing to
continue the termination proceedings so that Father could petition for court-
appointed counsel. We therefore vacate the order terminating Father’s
parental rights, and we remand this matter to the court for a new
termination hearing, prior to which the court shall determine whether Father
-7-
J-S28045-17
continues to qualify for court-appointed counsel, and shall appoint counsel
for Father if necessary.2
Order vacated. Case remanded for further proceedings consistent with
this opinion. Jurisdiction relinquished.
Judgment Entered.
Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.
Prothonotary
Date: 6/21/2017
____________________________________________
2
Because Father’s first issue requires that we vacate the order terminating
his parental rights, we need not address his second issue.
-8-