DocketNumber: No. 546
Judges: Hamilton
Filed Date: 11/29/1913
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/13/2024
delivered tbe following opinion:
Tbe defendant was indicted for cashing a money order not directed or intended for ber, and duly arraigned. At first sbe pleaded not guilty, and afterwards, on consulting an attor
The sole reason for the exercise of clemency is that the defendant is a woman. No one is more reluctant than the judge of this court to sentence a woman, or to see a woman appear as a prisoner at the bar. The question, however, is not one of reluctance, but of duty. There may be occasions where her sex makes a woman more easily tempted, or more apt to commit some particular offense; and in such a case, this fact should and would be taken into account in the imposition of punishment. But forging a $15 money order is not one of such cases, and the court believes that the course suggested by the defendant’s counsel would have a bad public effect. The court thinks that if the prisoner is guilty of the offense, she should receive, despite her sex, substantially the same punishment as a man under similar circumstances.
And now in open court the defendant asks leave to withdraw the plea of guilty, and enters a plea of not guilty, and the case is transferred to the Ponce division for trial at the Janu