DocketNumber: No. 97-221-A
Citation Numbers: 701 A.2d 1027, 1997 R.I. LEXIS 282, 1997 WL 683610
Filed Date: 10/24/1997
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/26/2024
ORDER
This matter is here on the plaintiffs’ appeal from a Superior Court order affirming the decision of the Personnel Appeal Board that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the plaintiffs’ appeal.
On February 22, 1994, the plaintiffs appealed the commission’s action to the Personnel Appeal Board which dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The plaintiffs then appealed the matter to the Superior Court pursuant to the provisions of G.L.1956 (1993 Reenactment) § 42-35-15. On May 10,1996, a trial justice rendered a written decision affirming the board’s decision. Thereafter, the plaintiffs filed the instant appeal.
We conclude that a direct appeal is not the proper method to review a final judgment rendered in proceedings under § 42-35-15. Pursuant to § 42-35-16, the proper procedure to review a final judgment rendered in proceedings under § 42-35-15 is to petition this court for a writ of certiorari. Hamaker v. Gagnon, 110 R.I. 709, 297 A.2d 351 (1972).
Because plaintiffs have faded to seek review in accordance with § 42-35-16, their appeal is denied and dismissed. The papers of the case may be remanded to the Superior Court.