DocketNumber: 11508
Citation Numbers: 123 S.E. 100, 128 S.C. 375, 128 S.E. 100, 1924 S.C. LEXIS 232
Judges: Cothran, Messrs, Watts, Fraser, Marion, Chiee, Gary
Filed Date: 5/13/1924
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
May 13, 1924. The opinion of the Court was delivered by Action for damages on account of the alleged negligent installation and management of an incinerator, whereby the plaintiff's property had been damaged by reason of the noxious and disagreeable odors consequent upon its operation. From a judgment of $450 in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant has appealed.
The appellant relies upon the following propositions for a reversal of the judgment: (1) That the cause of action stated in the complaint is not maintainable against a municipal corporation, in the absence of a statute authorizing it.
(2) That assuming that the delict complained of constituted a public nuisance, the evidence fails to show that the plaintiff has suffered any damages differing in kind from what the general public has suffered.
As to the first proposition: Opposed to the opinion of the writer, the Court has decided to the contrary, in the case of Faust v. Richland County,
As to the second proposition: It is held in the case of Belton v. Wateree Power Co.,
The judgment must therefore be affirmed, and it is so ordered.
MESSRS. JUSTICE WATTS, FRASER and MARION concur.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE GARY did not participate. *Page 377