DocketNumber: 11734
Judges: Cothran, Messrs, Watts, Fraser, Marion, Gary
Filed Date: 4/1/1925
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/14/2024
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Upon consideration of the evidence in this case, a review of which would serve no useful purpose, the Court is convinced that it was not sufficient to justify a submission of the issue of the defendant’s guilt to the jury, *171 and that his motion for a directed verdict should have been granted.
The judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed.
Duane Aubrey Diggs v. Commonwealth of Virginia ( 2015 )
Adian Marsell Barth v. Commonwealth ( 2007 )
Michael Anthony Starr, etc. v. Commonwealth ( 1995 )
Harper v. Commonwealth ( 1955 )
Roger Bowman v. Commonwealth of Virginia ( 2013 )
Powell v. Commonwealth ( 2001 )
Hairston v. Commonwealth ( 1986 )
Wilson v. Commonwealth ( 2000 )
Blake v. Commonwealth ( 2014 )
Etheridge v. Commonwealth ( 1969 )
Ramsey v. Commonwealth ( 1958 )
Michelle Dawn Yoder v. Commonwealth of Virginia ( 2018 )
James v. Commonwealth ( 1951 )
Johnny Earl Arrington v. Commonwealth of Virginia ( 2010 )