Judges: Curia, Dunkin, Johnson, Johnston, Sumter
Filed Date: 6/15/1845
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024
This court concurs with the Chancellor, in the result of his decree, upon the merits of the case.
It appears the Chancellor misconceived the counsel with regard to the costs. But for this misapprehension they would have been allowed to follow the decree.
It is therefore ordered that the decree be affirmed; and that the defendants pay the costs,