State v. Christopher M. Moore

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Christopher Marquavious Moore, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2016-001429
Appeal From Chester County
Paul M. Burch, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-405
Submitted September 1, 2018 – Filed November 7, 2018
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia,
and Christopher Marquavious Moore, pro se, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Deputy
Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, both of Columbia,
for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
LOCKEMY, C.J., and THOMAS and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.