Henry Nesbit, Jr. v. State

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
Henry Nesbit, Jr., Petitioner,
v.
State of South Carolina, Respondent.
Appellate Case No. 2019-000381
Appeal From Charleston County
G. Thomas Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2023-UP-086
Submitted November 1, 2022 – Filed March 15, 2023
AFFIRMED
Jeffrey Wayne Buncher, Jr., of Uricchio Howe Krell
Jacobson Toporek Theos & Keith, PA, and Jerry
Nicholas Theos, of Theos Law Firm, LLC, both of
Charleston, for Petitioner.
Assistant Attorney General Joshua Abraham Edwards, of
Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: This Court granted certiorari to review the post-conviction relief
(PCR) court's finding that Petitioner failed to prove his trial counsel was
ineffective for not requesting a jury instruction on the lesser-included offense of
simple possession of cocaine. We affirm.
We find that probative evidence supports the PCR court's finding that trial counsel
was not deficient for failing to request a jury instruction on the lesser-included
offense of simple possession of cocaine. See Sellner v. State, 416 S.C. 606, 610,
787 S.E.2d 525, 527 (2016) (holding a reviewing court "will uphold [the factual
findings of the PCR court] if there is any evidence of probative value to support
them"); Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984) (providing that
deficiency is the first prong of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim); id. at
700 ("Failure to make the required showing of either deficient performance or
sufficient prejudice defeats the ineffectiveness claim."). There was no evidence
presented at trial from which the jury could have concluded that Petitioner
possessed less than one gram of cocaine. Thus, Petitioner was not entitled to a jury
instruction on simple possession, and trial counsel was not deficient for failing to
request such an instruction. See State v. Sams, 410 S.C. 303, 308, 764 S.E.2d 511,
513 (2014) ("The law to be charged to the jury is determined by the evidence
presented at trial."); id. ("The trial court is required to charge a jury on a
lesser-included offense if there is evidence from which it could be inferred that the
defendant committed the lesser, rather than the greater, offense."); S.C. Code Ann.
§ 44-53-370(d)(3) (2018) (providing that a person possessing one gram or less of
cocaine is guilty of simple possession of cocaine).
AFFIRMED. 1
GEATHERS and MCDONALD, JJ., and HILL, A.J., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.