State v. Dunham

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Legerald F. Dunham, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2011-196669
Appeal From Lancaster County
Brooks P. Goldsmith, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-653
Submitted November 1, 2012 – Filed December 12, 2012
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Elizabeth Anne Franklin-Best, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Senior Assistant Deputy
Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and
Solicitor Douglas A. Barfield, Jr., of Lancaster, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
FEW, C.J., and WILLIAMS and PIEPER, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.