Grate v. Waccamaw EOC

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
Joseph N. Grate, Appellant,
v.
Waccamaw EOC, Inc., Respondent.
Appellate Case No. 2012-209227
Appeal From Horry County
William H. Seals, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-247
Submitted May 1, 2013 – Filed June 12, 2013
AFFIRMED
Joseph N. Grate, of Pawleys Island, pro se.
Ralph J. Wilson, Sr., of Ralph J. Wilson, Attorney at
Law, P.A., of Conway, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: Ulmer v. Ulmer, 369 S.C. 486, 490, 632 S.E.2d 858, 861 (2006) ("An
appellate court will not consider issues on appeal which have not been preserved
for appellate review."); Peay v. Ross, 292 S.C. 535, 537, 357 S.E.2d 482, 484 (Ct.
App. 1987) ("Since the insufficiency of the evidence was not properly raised at
trial, [this court] cannot review the judgment on that ground."); Lites v. Taylor, 284
S.C. 316, 318, 326 S.E.2d 173, 175 (Ct. App. 1985) ("The failure of a [party] to
move for a directed verdict at trial precludes a challenge on appeal to the
sufficiency of the evidence.").
AFFIRMED.1
HUFF, WILLIAMS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.