Moore v. SCDEW

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
Charles Moore, Appellant,
v.
South Carolina Department of Employment and
Workforce, Respondent.
Appellate Case No. 2011-191026
Appeal from the Administrative Law Court
Carolyn C. Matthews, Administrative Law Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-249
Submitted April 1, 2013 – Filed June 12, 2013
AFFIRMED
Charles Moore, of Myrtle Beach, pro se.
Eugene Belton McLeod, III, of the South Carolina
Department of Employment and Workforce, of
Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authority: Brown v. S.C. Dep't of Health & Envtl. Control, 348 S.C. 507, 519, 560
S.E.2d 410, 417 (2002) ("[I]ssues not raised to and ruled on by the [Administrative
Law Court] are not preserved for appellate consideration.").
AFFIRMED.1
SHORT, THOMAS, and PIEPER, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.