DocketNumber： 2011-UP-019
Filed Date： 1/25/2011
Status： Non-Precedential
Modified Date： 10/22/2024
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Octavius Livingston, Appellant.
Appeal From Richland County
James R. Barber, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-019
Submitted January 1, 2011 Filed January
25, 2011
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Solicitor Warren Blair Giese, all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Octavius Livingston appeals his conviction for distribution of cocaine, third-offense. Livingston argues the trial court violated his confrontation clause rights by admitting the police officer's testimony regarding the video tape of an undercover officer's conversation with a confidential informant. After a thorough review of the record, counsel's brief, and Livingston's pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
FEW, C.J., SHORT and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.