State v. Wynn

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Roderick Jermaine Wynn, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2014-001887
Appeal From Spartanburg County
R. Keith Kelly, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-525
Submitted October 1, 2015 – Filed November 18, 2015
AFFIRMED
Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant
Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of
Columbia; and Solicitor Barry Joe Barnette, of
Spartanburg, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: State v. Baccus, 367 S.C. 41, 48, 625 S.E.2d 216, 220 (2006) ("In
criminal cases, the appellate court sits to review errors of law only."); State v.
Dunbar, 356 S.C. 138, 141, 587 S.E.2d 691, 694 (2003) ("In order for an issue to
be preserved for appellate review, it must have been raised to and ruled upon by
the trial judge. Issues not raised and ruled upon in the trial court will not be
considered on appeal."); State v. Johnson, 363 S.C. 53, 58-59, 609 S.E.2d 520, 523
(2005) ("If a party fails to properly object, the party is procedurally barred from
raising the issue on appeal."); State v. Rios, 388 S.C. 335, 342, 696 S.E.2d 608,
612 (Ct. App. 2010) (holding the failure to contemporaneously object to jury
charges fails to preserve the issue for appellate review).
AFFIRMED.1
HUFF, WILLIAMS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.