State v. Mosley

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Lester Devaria Mosley, Jr., Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2014-002064
Appeal From Pickens County
Edward W. Miller, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-353
Submitted June 1, 2017 – Filed September 6, 2017
AFFIRMED
William G. Yarborough, III, of William G. Yarborough
III, Attorney at Law, LLC, of Greenville, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General J. Robert Bolchoz, Deputy Attorney
General Donald J. Zelenka, and Senior Assistant
Attorney General William Edgar Salter, III, all of
Columbia; and Solicitor William Walter Wilkins, III, of
Greenville, all for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: State v. Williams, 303 S.C. 410, 411, 401 S.E.2d 168, 169 (1991) ("A
defendant must object at his first opportunity to preserve an issue for appellate
review."); State v. Williams, 266 S.C. 325, 335, 223 S.E.2d 38, 43 (1976) ("The
rule in this [s]tate is firmly established that failure to object to a charge, . . . when
the opportunity is afforded, constitutes a waiver of any right to complain on appeal
of an alleged error in the charge."); State v. Hill, 268 S.C. 390, 395, 234 S.E.2d
219, 221 (1977) ("By failing to object or request[] additional instructions to the
main charge, [the a]ppellant waived any objection to similar subsequent
instructions.").
AFFIRMED.1
SHORT, WILLIAMS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.