SCDSS v. Henderson

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Amanda Kneeream and David Henderson, Defendants,
Of whom David Henderson is the Appellant.
In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2017-000793
Appeal From Spartanburg County
Phillip K. Sinclair, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-054
Submitted January 8, 2018 – Filed January 30, 2018
AFFIRMED
Erick Matthew Barbare, of The Barbare Law Firm, of
Greenville, for Appellant.
Deborah Murdock Gentry, of Murdock Law Firm, LLC,
of Mauldin, for Respondent.
Jacqueline Alicia Moss, of the Law Firm of Jacqueline
Moss, of Spartanburg, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: David Henderson appeals the family court's final order
terminating his parental rights to two of his minor children. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2017). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant
briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Henderson's
counsel.
AFFIRMED.1
WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.