DocketNumber： 2009-UP-535
Filed Date： 11/19/2009
Status： Non-Precedential
Modified Date： 10/22/2024
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Karl Rogers, Appellant.
Appeal From Sumter County
George C. James, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-535
Submitted November 2, 2009 Filed
November 19, 2009
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Assistant Chief Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Karl Rogers appeals the revocation of his probation for forgery and committing a lewd act on a minor, arguing the circuit court deprived him of due process by ordering that he serve his sentences consecutively instead of concurrently. After thoroughly reviewing the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Rogers's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
WILLIAMS, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.