DocketNumber： 2009-UP-532
Filed Date： 11/19/2009
Status： Non-Precedential
Modified Date： 10/22/2024
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Bryan Orlando Hackett, Appellant.
Appeal From Greenwood County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-532
Submitted November 2, 2009 Filed
November 19, 2009
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Bryan Orlando Hackett appeals his probation revocation and resulting concurrent two-year sentences. Hackett argues the probation revocation was so summary that the record is insufficient for review. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Hackett's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
WILLIAMS, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.