City of Columbia v. Bolton

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

City of Columbia, Respondent,

v.

Luella Bolton, Appellant.

---

Appeal From Richland County
C. Tolbert Goolsby, Jr., Acting Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-065  
Submitted January 3, 2012 – Filed February 8, 2012

---

AFFIRMED

---

Luella Bolton, pro se, of Hopkins.

Constance D. Holloway, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Luella Bolton appeals the order of the circuit court affirming her appeal from the municipal court.  She argues the circuit court erred in finding evidence supported her conviction for failing to have an infant in a child passenger restraint seat.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority: City of Rock Hill v. Suchenski, 374 S.C. 12, 15, 646 S.E.2d 879, 880 (2007) ("In criminal appeals from municipal court, the circuit court does not conduct a de novo review. . . .  [An] appellate court reviews errors of law only." (citations omitted)).

AFFIRMED.

HUFF, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.