Kelly v. South Carolina Department of Social Services

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Camilla Kelly, Appellant,

v.

South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent.

---

Appeal From Orangeburg County
Barry W. Knobel, Family Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No.  2009-UP-122
Submitted February 2, 2009 – Filed March 5, 2009

---

AFFIRMED

---

Clarissa Warren Joyner, of Orangeburg, for Appellant.

Susan Anderson, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Camilla Kelly appeals the family court's dismissal of her appeal of an adverse administrative order.  Kelly argues the family court erred by dismissing her appeal because the administrative order violates her due process rights.  We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority:  Anderson v. Short, 323 S.C. 522, 525, 476 S.E.2d 475, 477 (1996) (holding where the ruling of the trial court is based on more than one ground, the appellate court will affirm unless appellant appeals all grounds).

AFFIRMED.[1]

SHORT, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.