DocketNumber： 2006-UP-213
Filed Date： 4/18/2006
Status： Non-Precedential
Modified Date： 10/11/2024
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Brandon Dubose, Appellant.
Appeal From Lexington County
William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2006-UP-213
Submitted April 1, 2006 Filed April 18, 2006
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, S.C. Dept. of Probation, Parole & Pardon, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Brandon Dubose pleaded guilty to temporary use of a vehicle without permission, failure to stop for a blue light, and criminal domestic violence of a high and aggravated nature (CDVHAN). The circuit court judge sentenced Dubose to one year imprisonment for temporary use of a vehicle without permission, three years imprisonment for failure to stop for a blue light, and ten years imprisonment for CDVHAN. Each of the concurrent sentences was suspended upon the service of two years probation. After violating several conditions of his probation, the circuit court judge revoked Duboses probation in full. Dubose appeals the revocation of his probation.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), counsel for Dubose attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating he had reviewed the record and concluded Duboses appeal is without legal merit sufficient to warrant a new trial. Dubose did not file a separate pro se response.
After a thorough review of the record pursuant to Anders and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsels petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.[1]
BEATTY, SHORT, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
[1] Because oral argument would not aid the court in resolving the issues on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.