DocketNumber： 2003-UP-562
Filed Date： 9/29/2003
Status： Non-Precedential
Modified Date： 10/11/2024
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Sean D. Nelson, Appellant,
Appeal From Charleston County
Daniel F. Pieper, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-562
Submitted July 15, 2003 Filed September
29, 2003
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey, of Columbia; for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, of Columbia; Solicitor Ralph E. Hoisington, of Charleston; for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Sean D. Nelson appeals his conviction for armed robbery and possession of a firearm during the commission of a violent crime. Nelson argues the trial court erred in refusing to include a specific jury charge regarding the relationship between eyewitness confidence and accuracy of identification. In a separate pro se brief, Nelson argues that the trial court erred in denying a motion to suppress in-court and out-of-court identifications, which Nelson claims were unduly suggestive and conducive of irreparable mistake. Nelsons counsel attached to the brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating that she had reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit. After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss [1] Nelsons appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., CONNOR and ANDERSON, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.