DocketNumber： 2007-UP-171
Filed Date： 4/17/2007
Status： Non-Precedential
Modified Date： 10/14/2024
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Kendrell Heidt, Appellant.
Appeal From Charleston County
Thomas L. Hughston, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-171
Submitted April 2, 2007 Filed April 17, 2007
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Office of the Attorney General, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Ralph E. Hoisington, of Charleston, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Kendrell Heidt appeals from his guilty plea to attempted armed robbery and accessory after the fact of murder. Heidts counsel contends the plea did not conform to the mandates of Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969). After a thorough review of the record, counsels brief, and Heidts pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Heidts appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., and GOOLSBY and STILWELL, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.