DocketNumber： 2007-UP-159
Filed Date： 4/5/2007
Status： Non-Precedential
Modified Date： 10/14/2024
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Rodriquez Abney, Appellant.
Appeal From Aiken County
Larry R. Patterson, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-159
Submitted April 2, 2007 Filed April 5, 2007
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, South Carolina Commission, of Columbia, for Appellant.
J. Benjamin Aplin, of S.C. Dept. of Probation Parole & Pardon, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Rodriquez Abney appeals the revocation of his probation. Abney argues the court should have considered Abneys failure to report to his probation agent was due to circumstances beyond his control. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Abneys counsel attached a petition to be relieved, stating he reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit. Abney did not file a pro se brief. After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Abneys appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
ANDERSON, KITTREDGE, and SHORT JJ., concur
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.