Citation Numbers： 7 U.S. 179, 2 L. Ed. 404, 3 Cranch 179, 1805 U.S. LEXIS 250
Judges： Marshall
Filed Date： 3/18/1805
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 10/19/2024
Supreme Court of United States.
C. Lee, for the petitioner, contended, that this was a final decree as to Ray, and cited 2 Fowler's Exchequer Practice, 195, to show, that such a decree would, in England, be considered such a final decree as would authorise an appeal.
March 5.
MARSHALL, Ch. J.
We can do nothing without seeing the record, and the papers offered cannot be considered by us as a record.
*180 The court, however, is of opinion, that a decree for a sale under a mortgage, is such a final decree as may be appealed from. We suppose, that when the court below understands that to be our opinion, it will allow an appeal, if it be a case to which this opinion applies.
Railroad Co. v. Swasey , 23 L. Ed. 136 ( 1875 )
Keystone Manganese & Iron Co. v. Martin , 10 S. Ct. 32 ( 1889 )
McGourkey v. Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co. , 13 S. Ct. 170 ( 1892 )
Rector v. United States , 20 F.2d 845 ( 1927 )
City of Boston v. Boston Edison Company, City of Boston v. ... , 260 F.2d 872 ( 1958 )
Wells v. Shriver , 81 Okla. 108 ( 1921 )
Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co. v. Simmons , 8 S. Ct. 58 ( 1887 )
Grant v. Phoenix Ins. Co. , 1 S. Ct. 414 ( 1882 )
Citibank, N. A. v. Data Lease Financial Corporation , 645 F.2d 333 ( 1981 )
The Palmyra , 6 L. Ed. 376 ( 1825 )
Beebe v. Russell , 15 L. Ed. 668 ( 1857 )
John Perkins v. Edward F. Fourniquet and Wife, and Martin W.... , 12 L. Ed. 406 ( 1848 )
leslie-taylor-and-kevin-taylor-minors-by-wilbert-taylor-and-hallie , 288 F.2d 600 ( 1961 )
Bronson v. Railroad Co. , 17 L. Ed. 359 ( 1863 )
Humiston v. Stainthorp , 17 L. Ed. 905 ( 1865 )
Horace C. Silsby v. Elisha Foote , 15 L. Ed. 822 ( 1858 )
La Bourgogne , 28 S. Ct. 664 ( 1908 )
Chicago & Vincennes Railroad v. Fosdick , 27 L. Ed. 47 ( 1882 )
Thomson v. Dean , 19 L. Ed. 94 ( 1869 )
MDG Supply, Inc. v. Diversified Investments, Inc. , 51 Haw. 375 ( 1969 )