DocketNumber： 181
Citation Numbers： 169 U.S. 365, 18 S. Ct. 946, 42 L. Ed. 779, 1898 U.S. LEXIS 1500
Filed Date： 2/28/1898
Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 4/15/2017
169 U.S. 365
18 S.Ct. 946
42 L.Ed. 779
SMITH vsrv. NAPHTALY.
No. 181.
February 28, 1898.
Henry F. Crane, for appellant.
A. T. Britton and A. R. Browne, for appellee.
Mr. Justice PECKHAM delivered the opinion of the court.
In this case counsel for the appellant concedes that if the court should hold that the sale of the land mentioned in the patent involved in the foregoing case (18 Sup. Ct. 354) were a valid sale, then the judgment in this case should be affirmed. As we do so hold, the judgment herein is therefore affirmed.
In Re Freeman , 132 N.J. Eq. 135 ( 1942 )
St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Smith , 20 Tex. Civ. App. 451 ( 1899 )
Sanders v. Allen , 58 F. Supp. 417 ( 1944 )
Seber v. Spring Oil Co. , 33 F. Supp. 805 ( 1940 )
Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. State Ex Rel. Vassar , 187 Okla. 164 ( 1940 )
Commercial Metals Company v. Balfour, Guthrie, and Company, ... , 577 F.2d 264 ( 1978 )
Sandsberry v. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. , 114 F. Supp. 834 ( 1953 )