Citation Numbers: 76 U.S. 736
Judges: Nelson
Filed Date: 12/15/1869
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
subsequently delivered the opinion of the court, to the effect, that as to the entry which the court on motion allowed to be made in the journal nunc pro tunc, as the matter was one which arose from the inadvertence of the clerk, the entry was but common practice and matter of course, and that the amendment to the marshal's return was of daily practice also.
The judgment for the writ of attachment was accordingly
Affirmed.