DocketNumber: 206
Judges: Marshall
Filed Date: 10/21/1968
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/15/2024
Supreme Court of United States.
David T. Searls, Harry M. Reasoner, and Lloyd F. Thanhouser for appellant.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, and Lawrence W. Somerville for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
Being convinced on the record before us that Malco Refineries, Inc., was not a "failing company," United States v. Third National Bank, 390 U. S. 171, 183 (1968); International Shoe Co. v. FTC, 280 U. S. 291 (1930), and that the record otherwise supports the decree, United States v. Pabst Brewing Co., 384 U. S. 546 (1966), we affirm the judgment of the District Court.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, believing that this case involves issues of fact and law which should not be decided without plenary consideration, would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for argument.
MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
United States v. Taylor ( 1988 )
Chemical Tank Lines, Inc. v. Holstine ( 1968 )
United States v. Warren Dale Keefer ( 1986 )
United States v. Bernard P. Elkin, A/K/A "Bob Elkin," and ... ( 1984 )
United States v. Jack Anthony Lucido ( 1973 )
United States v. Charles Edgar Wright, United States of ... ( 1974 )
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,517 United States of America v. ... ( 1974 )
United States v. Marzell Peterson ( 1975 )
United States v. Ronald Lyles, Jesse Johnson, Carlos Holder ... ( 1979 )
United States v. Rogers ( 1995 )
United States v. Percy Branker ( 1969 )
United States v. Kenneth Clark and Eric Romandi ( 1979 )